Limitations of Using a Payback Period for Analysis

This is the idea that money is worth more today than the same amount in the future because of the earning potential of the present money. When talking about the time value of money, it assumes that money coming in sooner is going to be more valuable as it can be used to make more. The payback period method completely ignores the time value of money, whether that is a positive or a negative gross pay vs net pay thing for the project and business. If a business only looks at one factor, then potentially promising investments can be missed. Nothing is going to hurt small or medium businesses more than a massive loss on an investment. Unless you are at the top of your industry, there are always going to be tight budgets and financial constraints, and any big losses could mean major issues.

The NPV is the difference between the present value of cash coming in and the current value of cash going out over a period of time. There is some usefulness to this method, especially in quick-moving industries with a lot of rapid change. The problem for most businesses is that they need to have a better balance of projects and investments so that their short, mid, and long-term needs are all taken care of.

Advantages of the payback period

There can be issues where projects look so similar in scope and ability that choosing is going to be difficult without some solid numbers to back it up. The payback period will be able to show exactly which investment is going to be better based on ROI, which should make the decision easier. When there is not much else to differentiate multiple projects, a manager is going to need all the information and help he/she can get to make a decision. If a payback period is larger than targeted period, the project would be rejected. This is considered the first screening method, but organizations may use any other techniques to appraise the project.

  • Some of the common alternatives to the payback period are the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), and the profitability index (PI).
  • In its first three years, the project is expected to return net cash of $10,000, $25,000, and $50,000.
  • This budgeting tactic is purely focused on short-term cash flow and getting the fastest possible return, so it misses a lot of other considerations.
  • But there are drawbacks to using the payback period in capital budgeting.

For this purpose, two types of machines are available in the market – Machine X and Machine Y. Machine X would cost $18,000 where as Machine Y would cost $15,000. The expansion will produce an annual increase in cash flow of $50,000/year (1,250 pairs x $40/pair) from the expansion. At this rate, the company will realize a total of $150,000 cash flow for the first three years of the expansion. This method also does not take into account other factors such as risk, financing or any other considerations that come into play with certain investments.

Start learning with StudySmarter, the only learning app you need.

They payback method is a handy tool to use as an initial evaluation of different projects. It works very well for small projects and for those that have consistent cash flows each year. However, the payback method does not give a complete analysis as to the attractiveness of projects that receive cash flows after the end of the payback period.

Disadvantages of the Payback Method

The payback period method provides a simple calculation that the managers at Sam’s Sporting Goods can use to evaluate whether to invest in the embroidery machine. The payback period calculation focuses on how long it will take for a company to make enough free cash flow from the investment to recover the initial cost of the investment. No matter how careful the planning and analysis, a business is seldom sure what future cash flows will be. Some projects are riskier than others, with less certain cash flows, but the payback period method treats high-risk cash flows the same way as low-risk cash flows. A second disadvantage of using the payback period method is that there is not a clearly defined acceptance or rejection criterion. When the payback period method is used, a company will set a length of time in which a project must recover the initial investment for the project to be accepted.

Payback Period Calculation

If your company is concerned at all about cash flow for the business over time, this method is not going to give you any information to work with. As every project is going to provide cash flow on a different schedule, it is going to be impossible to make any but the most basic decisions based on this method. A business needs to know what kind of cash flow they should expect from their investments for the entire length of the project.

You could end up ignoring to take a project that could have been profitable in the long run. The fact that a project has a longer payback period may force you to take another project that is way less profitable. This is why you should combine the payback period technique with other capital budgeting methods to visualize a project’s earned value in the future. The payback period with the shortest payback time is generally regarded as the best one.

Getting repaid or recovering the initial cost of a project or investment should be achieved as quickly as it allows. However, not all projects and investments have the same time horizon, so the shortest possible payback period needs to be nested within the larger context of that time horizon. For example, the payback period on a home improvement project can be decades while the payback period on a construction project may be five years or less. This period does not account for what happens after payback occurs. Many managers and investors thus prefer to use NPV as a tool for making investment decisions.

This is the idea that money is worth more today than the same amount in the future because of the earning potential of the present money. When talking about the time value of money, it assumes that money coming in sooner is going to be more valuable as it can be used to make more.…